Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Local Economic Footprint & LivelihoodSub-indicator 10 of 16

Livelihoods & Quality of Local Life

Tourism improves long-term living standards locally

Beyond individual wages, does tourism improve the broader quality of life in a destination? This sub-indicator looks at the longer-term livelihood impacts of tour activity — whether residents are genuinely better off because of tourism and whether operators can demonstrate measurable improvement.

Whether tourism activity improves the long-term livelihoods and quality of life of local residents, beyond immediate employment.

How RTA measures this

The same sub-indicator is assessed from two sides: operators self-assess their performance; travellers rate their experience. Both use a 1–5 scale.

Operator self-assessment

To what extent did this tour contribute to improving long-term livelihoods and quality of life for local residents?

  1. 1We do not know. And/or: tourism in the destination is said to have created problems such as waste, water shortage, etc., but we are not responsible for it.
  2. 2We cannot measure this.
  3. 3We employ some local people whose livelihoods have improved. And/or: the partners / businesses involved in the tour have increased their revenue.
  4. 4We were told by locals that the living conditions of the local community have improved and/or that our tour helped to revive some declining traditional activities. Or: our tour helps visited local businesses to sustain their activities.
  5. 5We monitor the impacts of this tour: livelihoods have improved significantly for local people since the tour started. And/or: some marginalized people now have regular revenue and recognition. (Information is available.)
Traveller rating

How well did this tour appear to support long-term improvements to local livelihoods and quality of life?

  1. 1There was no visible evidence that the tour contributed to local livelihoods beyond basic transactions.
  2. 2Limited evidence of positive livelihood impact was apparent — the benefits seemed to go to very few people.
  3. 3Some signs of positive livelihood impact were visible, though the scale was unclear.
  4. 4Visible improvements to local livelihoods were evident — the tour clearly contributed positively to the community.
  5. 5The tour's positive impact on local livelihoods was outstanding — quality of life benefits for the community were clearly evident.

Other sub-indicators in Local Economic Footprint & Livelihood

Rate this indicator yourself

Complete a questionnaire and see how an operator scores across all 16 sub-indicators.